The INVESTMENTmatters Subscription Service

The full Weekly Investment Markets Overview is available as part of our Subscription only service This extensive Investment Information Service incorporates:-

  • Weekly Investment Markets Overview Newsletter  
  • Investmentimer Technical Analysis Service  
  • INVESTMENTmatters Market insight service

This will save you hours of Research and Technical Analysis, It will be your source of valuable information information all in one place, the work has been done for you through painstaking expert sifting of relevant information, presenting you with concise and easy to access Reports, Charts & Graphics, to aid you in making the best Investment Decisions.

This Blog now shows a ‘taster’ of the regular Weekly Investment Markets Overview Newsletter

Thank you for your interest, I look forward to being of service to you in the future, please do not hesitate to post a comment or contact me if you have particular requirements for investment information.

Charlie Aitken



Senior Analyst Jeffrey Kennedy shares techniques that helped spot a trading opportunity.
By Elliott Wave InternationalA chart excerpted from our educational subscription service shows you how to spot a turning point with Fibonacci. Read more

A Job Not Well Done?

Sir Mervyn Allister King, GBE, FBA is the current Governor of the Bank of England and Chairman of the Monetary Policy Committee. Last week he unveiled the Bank’s, and his last, quarterly Inflation report, exiting on a more optimistic note by saying, “There is a welcome change in the economic outlook, today’s projections are for growth to be a little stronger and inflation a little weaker than we expected three months ago.” Growth projections over 2013 was projected by the Bank to come in at around 1.2%, up from its 1% forecast in February, whilst the annual inflation rate is likely to drop to the Bank’s official target of 2 per cent within two years, having previously warned that the rate would remain above this level over the forecast period.

At the end of June he retires on a wonderful pension, mooted to be over £200K pa, the result of a non-contributory final salary scheme, called a court section, which lets him accrue a pension worth two-thirds of his final salary after just 20 years, twice as fast as any other final-salary schemes, if you can find one in the private sector that is, which are designed to generate a two-thirds pension after 40 years.

So was he worth the £300, 000 annual salary, plus benefits, not to mention the aforementioned pension? Let’s have a look.

After an academic career, during which time he served a spell as the visiting professor at Harvard and MIT, sharing an office with Ben Benanke, the then assistant professor, King joined the Bank of England in March 1991 as chief economist and executive director, being appointed Deputy Governor in 1997, then as Governor on 1 June 1998.

weekly_blog_130522_01

The Bank of England’s core purpose is monetary stability, meaning stable prices and confidence in the currency, according to its web-site. Stable prices are defined by the Government’s inflation target, which the Bank seeks to meet through the decisions delegated to the Monetary Policy Committee, of which Mervyn chairs.

A glance at the chart above shows that over his 15 year tenure, the annual inflation rate, as defined by CPI, has been anything but stable, missing the 2% pa target for most of the period. Likewise for the currency, which has seen a 35% swing in “value” when measured against the $US.

When the currency is measured on a “trade weighted basis” it shows little, if any, confidence at all.

weekly_blog_130522_02

The bank’s second core purpose is financial stability, which entails detecting and reducing threats to the financial system as a whole. On this front King, after becoming the Governor, explained that Bank of England policy was “similar to that of the Federal Reserve” under Alan Greenspan, where Greenspan described his approach as “mitigating the fallout from the bursting of a bubble when it occurs,” agreeing with Greenspan that, “It is hard to identify asset price ‘bubbles.’

weekly_blog_130522_03

Well, aside of ignoring the warnings about the UK housing market, given in 2004 and 2005, Mervyn has reigned over a period a falling economic growth, as defined by GDP, despite presiding over perhaps the largest credit bubble in history, which has led to a period of massive instability.

The ongoing disaster area, called QE, a policy that punishes the prudent whilst foolhardily propping up bust financial institutions, will be the legacy of Mervyn king’s Governorship and the history is unlikely to be kind.

During a television interview with Sky news this past Sunday, the Governor stated, “I’m not satisfied with the pace of the UK’s recovery and more needs to be done,” going on to say, “we need to do more to use up spare capacity.”

What he and his cohorts consistently fail to mention, assuming that they understand basic economics, is that by presiding over a credit bubble, particularly the size of this one, it creates massive over-capacity and deters sound businesses from adding to it.

So in summary, he hasn’t been worth it, but then few of the Central Bank Governors’ have.

PS    Just so that you know that it isn’t just me, the following is a comment from David Blanchflower, Professor of economics at Dartmouth College and a former member of the Bank of England MPC, from an interview with Bloomberg’s Tom Keene last Friday (bold emphasis is mine):-

Q: You and Mervyn King are never going to be best of friends. He was selling the idea that recovery is just around the corner in the U.K. Are you a buyer?

A: Well, I think it was the 89th press conference for an inflation report and over the last 20, he has more or less said the same thing. But each time, he has had to come to the next one and say, actually I was wrong last time, but don’t worry, the next time it is going to come. Some recovery is going to come because when you are sitting at zero, which is where the U.K. economy is, growth of 0.2 is a recovery but I wouldn’t give up the day job. The performance of the economy over the last 10 quarters has been disastrous, 0.1 percent average a quarter, and all driven by the Olympics. So to say there is some recovery coming — well, it’s pretty hard not to, given there hasn’t been any growth at all.

Quite!

Investment Markets Overview – w/e 17 May 2013

The Group of Seven finance chiefs and their central bankers met up at a stately home, just outside of London, last weekend, hosted by the UK as it is President of both the G7 and the G8 (the 7 plus Russia) this year. There are three priorities for the G-7, according to UK Chancellor Osborne, monetary activism, fiscal responsibility, and structural reform. On monetary activism he confirmed that the central banks have undertaken Quantitative Easing to support demand, without recognising the failure of a pick up on loan demand, whilst on the subject of fiscal responsibility he admitted that Government deficit and debt levels are too high in a number of G7 economies, including the UK, stating a resolve for G7 to strengthen the political will to undertake necessary reforms as French Finance Minister, Pierre Moscovici again criticised the drive to slash budget deficits, saying,I don’t like the word austerity.” Finally, on structural reform, he urged a need to maintain momentum in addressing the structural weaknesses in our banking system, observing that if the banking system remains impaired, financial instability will persist, and it will continue to hinder the lending so vital to the wider economy. No change here then.

130517_chart

Subscribe to the Full Investment Markets Overview Newsletter which contains the following additional commentaries:-

  • US economic data . . .

  • Euro-Zone   . . .

  • The UK . . .

  • Out East   . . .

  • The $US index  . . .

  • Within the commodities complex  . . .

  • Economic data due next week includes  . . .

  • Returning to the proposed G-7 objectives, George Osborne also said , . . .
          

  • Charts:-
    1. Indices Weekly
    2. US Retail & Food Sales Y on Y vs US Retail Sales Less Autos Y on Y
    3. UK Average Weekly Earnings vs UK Unemployment Rate Inverted
    4. Japan GDP Y on Y vs Japan Consumer Confidence
    5. Size of Shadow Economy as % of GDP

 

Table of 15 Indices, 11 columns of detailed information, for accurate analysis

 
                                   ”Never was so much owed by so many
 

Click  HERE to view Details of the full version of this Newsletter

which includes full text and detailed Charts for each section

Falling Like a BRIC

BRIC, a geo-economic acronym coined in 2001 by Jim O’Neill of Goldman Sachs, was apparently introduced to forecast a convergence among fast-growing emerging economies, forecasting that by 2030, the BRIC nations will have a combined economy larger than those of the G-7.

Well, 2030 is still a long way off, but if stock-markets are a leading indicator of economic growth, the past 5 years has put a dent in this prediction.

The upper part of the following chart shows the performance of the FTSE BRIC Index, which represents the 50 largest companies by market cap from Brazil, Russia, India and China, weekly data points since January 2006. The blue line is a 40-week, or 200 day, moving average, often used as guidance to support and/or price resistance. Kindly note that the moving average has been a barrier to price since early 2011.
weekly_blog_130515_01

 
The lower part of the chart shows the BRIC index relative to the MS World Index, a free-float weighted stock index of developed world markets, i.e. it doesn’t include emerging markets.

As can be seen, the BRIC index has been underperforming the world index since as far back as late 2009, with this underperformance accelerating since 2011, see the red dashed line. Why is this?

Well, surely it cannot be down to worse economic growth within the BRIC economies, as post the 2007 financial crisis, 40 percent of all growth in the global economy has occurred in China, albeit that China’s rate of economic growth has slowed from 12% pa in 2007 to 7.7% now, versus the 3% pa projected for the global economy by the IMF.

But there lies the rub, China is the stand-out within the BRIC compilation, in respect of economic growth, as GDP for the other three has collapsed, as in Russia annualised 9.3% to 2.1%; India 11% to 4.5% and Brazil from 9.63% to just 1.4% now. Adding South Africa to the mix in 2010, expanding the acronym to BRICS, hasn’t helped on this front either, as it’s GDP has fallen from 7% in 2007 to 2.5% as at year end 2012.

weekly_blog_130515_02

So China has a distorting effect on how the BRIC index performs, but so does the fortunes of commodities, as all of the BRIC (and now BRICS) constituents are large commodity players, especially in agriculture.

As such, it’s of interest to overlay the BRIC index relative to a commodity index, shown in blue, where we can observe a close correlation to the “relative to global stocksuntil recently that is.

Is this suggesting that the BRICS are about to benefit from rising commodity prices OR that BRICS, Global GDP and the price of commodities in general are all signalling a major change in trend.

We will leave you to ponder on this.

 

Investment Markets Overview – w/e 10 May 2013

If anyone had doubts about the chronic waste of tax-payers money which goes on at the European Union, we would urge you to scroll through one of the myriad of ECB “working papers,” which in this case is No 1543 at May 2013, entitled,”Financial imbalances and household welfare Empirical evidence from the EU,” compiled by one “Livio Stracca,” a Senior Adviser in the Directorate General International and European Relations of the European Central Bank. Aside of immediately including a bold notation which states,” This Working Paper should not be reported as representing the views of the European Central Bank (ECB). The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the ECB,” itself a farce considering the author is a paid employee of the ECB, the subject matter, content and conclusions, in our opinion, are nonsensical. Furthermore, the following extract from the author’s conclusion also appears under a section entitled “non-technical summary,” can you believe?

130510_txt

130510_chart

Subscribe to the Full Investment Markets Overview Newsletter which contains the following additional commentaries:-

  • US economic data . . .

  • Euro-Zone   . . .

  • The UK . . .

  • Out East   . . .

  • The $US index  . . .

  • Within the commodities complex  . . .

  • Economic data due next week includes  . . .

  • We couldn’t resist a further comment on those ECB’s working papers, . . .
          

  • Charts:-
    1. Indices Weekly
    2. The Bloomberg Consumer Comfort Index vs The US Federal Debt Ceiling
    3. UK Exports to EU and EU Imports from non-EU countries
    4. Shanghai Composite
    5. China’s New Yuan-Denomiated Lending
    6. China Gold imports from Hong Kong (volume)

Table of 15 Indices, 11 columns of detailed information, for accurate analysis

 
            “Surely, Austerity Should also Apply to Policymakers
 

Click  HERE to view Details of the full version of this Newsletter

which includes full text and detailed Charts for each section

On The Move Update

In late November 2012 we penned a piece entitled, “On the move to higher rates,” which commented on US interest rates including the likelihood that the 30-year treasury yield had hit a 35-year low in July 2012, at 2.45%. Furthermore, we highlighted that “post 2007 financial crisis, yields have plummeted as investors flocked to the perceived “safe haven” of sovereign debt. (Lending to the Government as governments never default??) Pointing out that volatility (a la the MOVE Index) had collapsed, falling to a 5 year low and an all time low.

This was then:

weekly_blog_130508_01

With volatility as follows:

weekly_blog_130508_02

Fast forward to now and we can see:

weekly_blog_130508_03

  • The June 2012 yield low has held, since when it has seen a high of 3.25%, before taking a breather.
  • The CCI Index, a basket of commodity prices, has been placed above the 30-year treasury yield, to dispel the myth that higher prices are bad for inflation and therefore likely to lead to higher interest rates. There is no evidence of this over the 35-year period.

Furthermore, as the price of the 30-year treasury has fallen, the inverse of the yield, volatility (MOVE) has continued to fall. In fact it’s now at a new all time low.

weekly_blog_130508_04

In November we concluded that, “when volatility of any security hits an all time low, the odds increase substantially that it is about to pick up and likely pick up with a vengeance.”

We stand by that conclusion.

Investment Markets Overview – w/e 3 May 2013

The English electorate sent a loud, clear message to the main political parties this week, they want change. The local elections, typically held mid-way between the parliamentary general election cycle, was expected to produce an upset, but not to the extent seen, as the relative new boys on the block, the United Kingdom Independent Party, or UKIP, grabbed 25% of the vote. Nearly 10,000 candidates were fighting for seats in English county councils and unitary authorities, in charge of schools, roads, refuse and local fire rescue services, but this vote has been on far wider issues and much more than the usual mid-term protest vote. This has been more to do with a vote against the establishment itself, a wish for radical change from the policies put forward by both the Tories and Labour and in particular with Britain’s place in Europe. They want a say on continued EU membership, or not, sooner than the proposed, “during the life of the next parliament,” as suggested by Prime Minister Cameron.

130503_chart

Subscribe to the Full Investment Markets Overview Newsletter which contains the following additional commentaries:-

  • US economic data . . .

  • Euro-Zone   . . .

  • The UK . . .

  • Out East   . . .

  • The $US index  . . .

  • Within the commodities complex  . . .

  • Economic data due next week includes  . . .

  • Corporate pay was back in the news this week and for the wrong reasons
          

  • Charts:-
    1. Indices Weekly
    2. US Personal Incomes vs Expenditures vs Consumer Confidence
    3. ECB Base Rate vs E-Z CPI Est
    4. Japan Household Spending vs Japan Unemployment Rate
    5. US 10 Yr Breakeven Rate vs TR/J CRB Commodities

 

Table of 15 Indices, 11 columns of detailed information, for accurate analysis

            “ All men make mistakes, but only wise men learn from them

Click  HERE to view Details of the full version of this Newsletter

which includes full text and detailed Charts for each section

Sell in May and Go Away

Today, May 1, begins a six-month period of unfavourable seasonality, of which we are commonly reminded by the saying “Sell in May and go away.”

Research published by Yale Hirsch in the Trader’s Almanac shows that the market year is broken into two six-month seasonality periods. From May 1 through October 31 is seasonally unfavourable, when the market most often finishes lower than it was at the beginning of the period.

From November 1 through April 30 is seasonally favourable, and the market most often finishes the period higher. While the statistical average results for these two periods are quite compelling, trying to guess the market in real-time in hopes of capturing these results is not always as easy as it sounds.

Below is a one-year chart showing the last two six-month seasonality periods. It begins on the 1st May 2012 and ends on 30th April. The left half of the chart shows the unfavourable May through October period and the right half shows the favourable November through April period. The green line shows the Dow’s level at the beginning of the favourable period, the red line the Dow’s level at the beginning of the unfavourable period. As you can see, the Dow did finish the unfavourable period lower than where it started, and in the favourable period it finished well above its starting point.

weekly_blog_130501_01

The 2011 one-year period is a textbook example of seasonality tendencies, but kindly note that the lines have now been reversed, with the green line now showing the Dow’s level at the beginning of the unfavourable period and the red line the Dow’s level at the beginning of the favourable period. (apologies for any confusion here, but it’s relevant for the remaining three charts.)

weekly_blog_130501_02

Regardless of how the market performs on average, every year is different and presents its own challenges, and there are no guarantees that any given period will conform to the average. Remember that bull and bear market pressures will override seasonal tendencies. The following chart is an example where a bull market completely ignored unfavourable seasonality.

weekly_blog_130501_02

And with the next chart the bear market ruled.

weekly_blog_130501_04

In conclusion, seasonal tendencies will be working against the stock market for the next six months. While this is no guarantee that the bears will have control, they will have the wind at their back and we suspect that this year there may just be a repeat of the 2008/09 chart shown above.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.